If only the rest of us were fortunate enough to have stuidity hurt the emitters as much as it hurts those at which said stupidity is directed. The Hill:
Several House Democrats are calling on Congress to recognize that climate change is hurting women more than men, and could even drive poor women to “transactional sex” for survival.
The weather makes women whores? Wait, what? They don’t have individual agency? Women are nothing more than pawns in nature?
The resolution, from Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and a dozen other Democrats, says the results of climate change include drought and reduced agricultural output. It says these changes can be particularly harmful for women.
Is it your contention, Democrats, that men don’t fucking eat, and that men wouldn’t be hurt by decreased agricultural output?
“[F]ood insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health,” it says.
Oh, okay. “Food insecure women” are the ones at risk. Gee, that isn’t misogynist at all. Also, climate change gave me AIDS? Really? That Team BLUE is trying to turn the
greenhouse effect global warming climate change in to another front on the so-called “war on women” shows that they know the gig is up. They’re desperate, and they’re willing to exploit any avenue they can in order to try and enforce their socialist agenda.
2013-05-03 :: madlibertarianguy